Scaffolder and Employer Fined £20K for Not Wearing Harness

ADVERTISEMENT

A scaffolder has been fined £750 and ordered to pay costs of £643 for not wearing a harness while working at height. His client, Giant Scaffolding Ltd, faced a more substantial penalty of £15,000 plus £5,000 in costs.

Gary Roser, a self-employed scaffolder from Hastings, was working for Giant Scaffolding Ltd on a four-storey scaffold at a building on East Parade, Hastings, last October.

He was observed by a passing Health & Safety Executive (HSE) inspector balancing on scaffolding tubes approximately 8 meters above the ground without a harness.

During the hearing at Hastings Magistrates’ Court, it was revealed that although harnesses were available in a van for the workers, they were not used. Industry guidelines mandate that scaffolders must wear a fall arrest harness when working more than 4 meters above the ground without a safe platform and edge protection in place.

Furthermore, the court heard that Battle-based Giant Scaffolding had repeatedly failed to respond to written inquiries from the inspector, despite numerous warnings.

HSE inspector Melvyn Stancliffe commented on the case, highlighting the importance of safety measures. “The simple measure of wearing a harness can save scaffolders from death or serious injury.

A basic common-sense approach to work is all that’s needed to prevent a possible tragedy. In many cases, harnesses are available but some workmen just cannot be bothered to wear them. They should take a moment to think about the consequences.”

He added, “It was reckless for Mr Roser to be working in this way. He was exposing himself and members of the public walking below to unnecessary risk. He was seen working in 2008 in similar circumstances and was warned about his future conduct. Giant Scaffolding Ltd has also been warned about the dangerous working practices of those working for it.”

SM Newsdesk
SM Newsdeskhttps://www.scaffmag.com
The staff at ScaffMag.com the leading scaffolding site for a digital generation.

Most popular ↑

Saudi firm breaks 27-year-old scaffolding world record

Saudi scaffolding firm Manar Al Omran has set a new Guinness World Record after building a 67.40m free-standing scaffold in Dammam.

CSCS challenges CISRS case for leaving card scheme

CSCS has challenged the reasons for CISRS’s planned departure, while CISRS tells ScaffMag its legal advice and concerns over duplicate cards underpin the decision.

SG4:10 We Think The Answer Is Fast Guard™

If Carlsberg made advance guardrails.....  could this be the...

Scaffold Innovations: GapClamp™

  Since the Work at Height Regulations 2005 came into...

Scaffold collapses at Sydney site weeks after two workers seriously injured

The scaffold came down at a development on Wattle...

Latest news

Right-to-work rules extend liability through construction supply chains

Contractors face new responsibilities for labour supplied through subcontracting chains as expanded right-to-work rules come into force.
- Advertisement -
More from

Right-to-work rules extend liability through construction supply chains

Contractors face new responsibilities for labour supplied through subcontracting chains as expanded right-to-work rules come into force.

Housing permission slump raises questions over future scaffolding workload

Planning permissions for new homes in England have fallen to their lowest quarterly level since 2012, raising questions over the volume of residential work likely to reach scaffolding contractors further down the construction pipeline.

Builder fined £120,000 after fatal fall through unsafe floor

W G Carter has been fined £120,000 after carpenter Richard “Felix” Roper suffered fatal injuries in a fall during building work, with HSE pointing to safer access and work sequencing.

Queensland coroner calls for mandatory tower scaffold controls after fatal collapse

A Queensland coroner has called for mandatory additional controls on freestanding tower scaffolds in public places after finding that the industry’s accepted height-to-base rule of thumb was not enough to protect against strong winds.
Latest articles