Company fined after live electrical cable is fixed to scaffolding

0
1992
A scaffolder has been fined ยฃ750 and ordered to pay costs of ยฃ643 for not wearing a harness while working at height. His client, Giant Scaffolding Ltd, faced a more substantial penalty of ยฃ15,000 plus ยฃ5,000 in costs.

A Jersey scaffolding firm has been fined ยฃ45,000 after putting workers at risk of electrocution and burns.

Jubilee Scaffolding Company was contracted to erect scaffolding at a property in St Lawrence, Jersey in August 2018.

But shortly after the scaffolding was erected, the owner of the property was surprised to discover that an uninsulated mains electrical cable had been secured to the scaffold using a scaffold fitting.

The Royal Court in Jersey heard that The Health and Safety Inspectorate was contacted and investigated the matter, calling in the companyโ€™s directors for an interview in December. The scaffolder responsible for erecting the scaffolding said that workers had believed the wire was a telephone cable not an electrical cable.

According to the Jersey Evening Post, Crown Advocate Conrad Yates said that there had been a โ€˜serious riskโ€™ of electric shock, burns or electrocution to workers from the exposed wire, while work was being carried out. He called for the company to be fined ยฃ40,000 for breaching health and safety laws.

The company. which pleaded guilty to the breaches, was represented by its managing director and owner Sarah Waye in court. She said that she had done โ€˜everything in her powerโ€™ to improve safety standards since last summer.

She added: “I canโ€™t believe that anybody did not see the cable. Iโ€™m dumbfounded.”

Ms Waye said that she understood why the Crown wanted to โ€˜send a messageโ€™ by imposing a fine for the law breach.

!-- 300 X 250 WITHIN CONTENT -->

During sentencing, Lieutenant-Bailiff Anthony Olsen said: “Itโ€™s the courtโ€™s conclusion that the crown was correct and the fine should be ยฃ40,000.”

He added that the company would be allowed four months to pay the fine and would also be charged a further ยฃ5,000 to cover the prosecutionโ€™s legal costs.