Google Street View Catches Scaffolders Working Unsafe

Image via: Google Street View
Image via: Google Street View
This damming image from Google street view shows scaffolders working unsafely while erecting a job in North Ferriby, East Riding of Yorkshire . The link to the image was posted today on our Facebook page by one of our followers. The date when the image was taken is unknown but it shows scaffolders erecting a scaffold on what looks like a vicarage in North Ferriby with a total disregard for safety. No PPE  is seen on any of the workers of the “cowboy outfit” and one so called scaffolder looks to be wearing trainers. This image comes to light as the Health & Safety Executive  just announced a month long safety blitz on construction sites across the country. Lets just hope firms like these cowboys are caught in the act before somebody is killed…

Should training centres for scaffolders offer credit ?

29

scaffolders

Most scaffolders training courses on average are around £1000, for most people, paying for there own training is on the expensive side. With the current economic downturn the cost of living is on the rise but wages stay the same. To put it simply everybody is skint. Should we now see training centres adopt some type of finance package for would-be scaffolders and scaffolders looking to progress in obtaining their Advanced Scaffolder CISRS card ? Well,  industry rumours suggest just this, training centres across the country are currently exploring new types of credit schemes as a way of getting more candidates through its doors and more scaffolders progressing up the training ladder. One idea is, training centres could adopt a credit scheme like a student loan, whereby a pre-arranged amount would be taken out of candidates weekly income. Currently in the United Kingdom there is 5,500 CISRS Trainee Scaffolders, 15,000 CISRS Basic Scaffolders and only 8,000 CISRS Advanced Scaffolders. Looking at these numbers you can see the large majority of trained scaffolders are not progressing with training to achieve an Advanced Card status. Could offering the rumored finance packages change these statistics? I am sure the training centres would hope so…. If training centres do adopt this type of financial assistance this would undoubtedly be a positive improvement to our industry. But what does need remembering, as one person pointed out to me, is that your employer still has a legal duty & responsibility to train it’s workforce to industry standard. So any credit schemes that do evolve, shouldn’t be used to take that responsibility from them. By Daniel Norton

Would you take on credit for scaffolding training ? It would be interesting to know your thoughts on this, let us know in the comments below.

HSE launches month-long national safety clampdown

The Health and Safety Executive (HSE) have today released details of a month-long safety clampdown on construction sites across the United Kingdom. The purge on construction sites is aimed at reducing death, injury and ill health. The HSE will visit sites where refurbishment or repair works are taking place. Health and Safety inspectors will make unannounced visits to sites between 18 February and 15 March. The visits are to ensure firms are managing high-risk activity, such as working at height. Also on the lists of checks the HSE will be making is general good order, assess welfare facilities and check whether suitable PPE such as head protection, is being used appropriately. Philip White, HSE Chief Inspector of Construction, said: “Death and injury continue to result from avoidable incidents and it is largely those engaged in refurbishment and repair work who are failing to step up to the mark. Poor management of risks and a lack of awareness of responsibilities is unacceptable. “In many cases simple changes to working practices can make all the difference, and can even save lives. Therefore if we find evidence that workers are being unnecessarily put at risk we will take strong action. “We are determined to drive the message home that site safety and worker welfare cannot be compromised.”

Hilti Impact Wrench: Guarantee will be void if used for scaffolding

impact wrench

Impact Wrench..

We have all heard about the benefits of using the impact wrench for erecting and dismantling scaffolding and some suggested it was the future for our industry. But rumors are now surfacing that one of the major manufactures of impact wrenches Hilti will no longer be supplying impact wrench fleet management packages to scaffolding contractors. These packages covered all tool service and repair costs for a fixed monthly charge. Hilti has confirmed these rumors to one website stating: “The reason was because that they weren’t intended to be used in the way that scaffolding contractors use them and they were constantly changing and repairing them due to motor burn out due to over torquing.” Although Hilti have said the impact wrenches are on sale to all trades but the lifetime service, 2 years no cost and Fleet Management will not be offered for this product when used on scaffolding applications.

The Demise Of The Impact Wench For Scaffolding…?

The question is now will the other large impact wrench manufactures Makita and Panasonic follow suit in removing their service packages for scaffolding contractors ? And could this be the first step in the demise of using impact wrenches for any scaffolding operations ? By Daniel Norton Do you use a Hilti Impact wrench ?  How do you think this will affect you ? Let us know in the comments below.

SCP launches new range of Galv-Span steel ladders

2
Scaffold & Construction Products (SCP), the Midlands based supplier of Scaffolding, Access & Building equipment who are owned by the Alumasc Group PLC are proud to be launching their new range of Galv-Span Steel Scaffold Ladders into the market place. Galvanised Ladder The new ladders are a galvanised, lightweight design that is fully EN131 compliant and available in 7 sizes from 3 meters to 8 meters. The Galv-Span ladders are manufactured & distributed under BSI Kitemark Licence KM584102. This new range is currently in stock at the company’s Midlands distribution facility, their vision is to supply this high quality, competitively priced product in bulk to the plant hire & resale market on a 2 day delivery service. SCP Commercial Manager, Matt Johnson said: “As a leading supplier of quality products in the UK we feel the Galv-Span Steel ladders are an excellent addition to our range, which has included ladders for over 10 years. “We are extremely proud of our BSI Kitemark which both confirms and endorses the EN131 conformity, quality and reliability of the product and are committed to providing our customers, both old & new, with a market leading 48 hour delivery service” To complimented this new range of ladders SCP also offer a range of Ladder Gates, Traps, Clamps & Stair Tread Units which are available in 900mm, 1050mm and 1200mm widths. For more information please visit www.scp-props.co.uk , email [email protected] or telephone the sales team on 01543 467 800.  

London scaffolding firm goes under

4
One of London and the south east’s big independent scaffolding contractors Deverson Direct has been placed in administration. The Canterbury-based firm worked on major projects throughout the capital for many of the major contractors and operated a workforce of up to 60 scaffolders. The firm has been trying to find a buyer for several weeks after running into cash flow problems and debts with supplier Generation UK. But its main lender called in administrator Begbies Traynor (Central) and all staff were told to go home. Rival scaffolding contractor Alltask, based in Rochester, is understood to have stepped in and taken on many of the staff who lost their jobs along with several of Deverson’s jobs. Deverson senior managers Mark Walton and Bruno Bohane have also joined Alltask. Neil Vinnicombe and Jon Beard of Begbies Traynor (Central) LLP have been appointed administrators. Story Via: constructionenquirer.com

Did you work for Deverson ? let us know your thoughts in the comments below.

VOSA lifts suspension on firms unsafe scaffolding vehicles

vosa

A scaffolding firm based in Rothwell has been given permission to run its fleet of vehicles again by VOSA after a hearing. The original order was given to LA Scaffolding on 31 January 2013 the order prevented the firm from running any vehicles to transport materials for it business. VOSA (the Vehicle and Operator Services Agency) slammed the firm with the order after stopping the vehicle at the roadside and finding numerous safety failings. The failings included tyres being worn almost smooth, one tyre had a deep cut with the cords exposed and the vehicle was overloaded. During further inspection VOSA found shortcomings with paperwork and records for vehicle safety checks, including routine inspections not being made and some vehicle defects not repaired, despite being identified to the firm. transportengineer.org.uk reported that at a second hearing on 05 February VOSA was satisfied that the company had made major improvements, so removed the licence suspension. He also recorded a formal warning for concerns identified by VOSA (the Vehicle and Operator Services Agency). Traffic Commissioner, Kevin Rooney commented:  “The operator has made significant improvements in management systems since the original hearing, recruited a qualified transport manager and joined the Road Haulage Association to ensure improvements are sustained,”. “All the vehicles have been inspected and given a clean bill of health. An undertaking has been given for a health check audit in six months. On that basis, I am content to lift the suspension.”

Let us know your thoughts in the comments below.

Scaffolder fined after woman is injured by unguarded scaffolding tube

A Scottish court yesterday fined a self employed scaffolder after he failed to apply numerous safety precautions resulting in the head injury of a pedestrian. The Health & Saftey Executive (HSE) reported that Thomas Hannen was contracted by Argyll and Bute Council in January 2011 to erect scaffolding around the disused Royal Hotel on Rothesay seafront, on the Isle of Bute, so the council could assess the building’s condition. Early on 26 January, Mr Hannen and two scaffolders began erecting the scaffolding. Members of the public were not excluded, or in any way actively discouraged, from using the pavement beneath the work area. Later that morning a council surveyor visited the site and drew Mr Hannen’s attention to an upright scaffolding tube that was obstructing the pavement. Before he left the site he mentioned to Mr Hannen that it was a busy pavement and that he should ensure people were safe. As a result, a scaffolding tube was placed horizontally between two of the upright standards at a height of about 1.5 metres above ground level. No padding or warning tape was wrapped around it to soften any inadvertent contact, make it easily visible or to alert members of the public to its presence. Later that morning, a 61-year-old local woman walking underneath the scaffolding, hit her head on the horizontal tube. She was taken to hospital with a head injury which required stitches, and more seriously, fractures to her left ankle caused by her falling as a result of her impact with the pole. An investigation into the incident by the Health and Safety Executive (HSE) found that Thomas Hannen failed to:
  • take advantage of the offer made to him by the local authority building standards officer to have the footpath where he was working temporarily closed;
  • complete any risk assessment or, alternatively, any risk assessment that was completed appears to have been wholly inadequate and did not guard against risk to pedestrians;
  • erect a scaffold on a pavement with any diversion in place to exclude members of the public from the work area;
  • display any warning signs alerting the public that it was dangerous to be in the work area such as putting padding or warning tape around any of the scaffolding tubes prior to the incident;
  • instruct his workers to attach padding or tape around the scaffolding under erection.
Thomas Hannen, 62, of, Ascog, Rothesay, was fined £1,670 after pleading guilty to breaching sections 3(2) of the Health and Safety at Work etc Act 1974. [quote type=”center”] Anyone planning construction work in public places should ensure they carry out a risk assessment that identifies potential dangers to members of the public and take adequate steps to prevent them.  [/quote] After sentencing, HSE Inspector Gerry Muir, said: “This was an awful accident to a member of the public that could easily have been avoided had Mr Hannen taken some simple, readily available precautions. “Anyone planning construction work in public places should ensure they carry out a risk assessment that identifies potential dangers to members of the public and take adequate steps to prevent them.”  

Let us know your thoughts on this in the comments below.

Safety warning over fake hard hats

Fake Hard Hat
Fake JSP Hard Hat. Image via: constructionenquirer.com
We are back on the subject of hard hats after a construction website reported a shocking safety warning. The Construction Enquirer reported today that experts at JSP are warning of a batch of poor quality counterfeit hard hats that have been discovered recently. JSP have said the hard hats are that poor they can be split in two with your bare hands. The hard hats are reported to of originated from Asia of the Middle East. The hard hats that have been copied are JSP’s MkII, they are easily identifiable from the marks “Burly” and “MkII” under the peak. Matthew Judson, JSP’s director of technical support, said users should make sure JSP’s name is branded into the helmet, and ensure that the user information leaflet is original – not a photocopy that is not square on the page – correctly spelled, in multiple languages, and with the manufacture’s contact details listed. They should examine the helmet closely for consistency of colour, clarity and legibility of markings and make sure it is durable. He said: “If you suspect a helmet is fake, give us a call and we will send someone out to have a look at it, or take it back to the place you bought it from. “If someone had been wearing a bogus helmet and an object had fallen on their head they could be dead.” Original story via The Construction Enquirer

Scaffolding firm caught on camera risking lives

2

hse stretford-scaffolding-pic1

A Trafford firm has appeared in court after workers were spotted taking down scaffolding without safety measures to prevent them being injured in a fall. They were witnessed working on the outside of a row of terraced shops on Ripponden Road in Oldham on 4 September 2012 by a passing inspector from the Health and Safety Executive (HSE). Trafford Magistrates’ Court heard Stretford Scaffolding Ltd had been hired to dismantle the scaffolding after it had been used by another company for a roofing project. Neither of the two men standing on the scaffolding platforms were wearing harnesses, despite working up to six metres above the ground, and one of them was not a trained scaffolder. He should therefore not have been allowed to work on a partially dismantled section. The court was told there were also no guard rails on part of the scaffolding to prevent workers falling. The HSE inspector issued an immediate Prohibition Notice, ordering the men to come down from the scaffolding until they were given suitable safety equipment by their employer. Stretford Scaffolding Ltd, of Ciss Lane in Urmston, received a 12-month conditional discharge and was ordered to pay costs of £1,849 after admitting a breach of the Work at Height Regulations 2005. [quote type=”center”]”This case should act as a warning to other scaffolding firms that they risk being prosecuted if they put lives at risk.”  [/quote] Speaking after the hearing, HSE Inspector Sandra Tomlinson said: “We are regularly called out to incidents where people have been seriously injured or even killed as a result of a fall from height. That’s why it’s vital scaffolding firms make sure safety is their top priority. “Stretford Scaffolding should never have allowed the scaffolding to be taken down without making sure workers could do the job safely. The most sensible way of achieving this would have been to use guard rails and harnesses. “The firm also put the life of one of the men at risk by allowing him to work on a partially dismantled section, despite the fact that he wasn’t a trained scaffolder. “This case should act as a warning to other scaffolding firms that they risk being prosecuted if they put lives at risk.” Advice on how to prevent workplace falls is available at www.hse.gov.uk/falls. Via: hse.gov.uk