The Safe Scaffold Bolt Fitting..
I present to you this new innovative fitting from Presco The Safe Scaffold Bolt Fitting. This new product is said to be an effective and safe method for eliminating protruding bolt threads. Ideal for use in narrow walkways, in cramped access areas and around doorways. We wanted to find out more about this new product, so we contacted the creator Lee Lipinski who exclusively told ScaffMag the story behind this innovative new product. So Lee can you tell our readers how you come up with the idea for The Safe Scaffold Bolt Fitting ?In the beginning..
I came up with the idea for the Safe Scaffold Bolt Fitting whilst working on a Power Station as an Electrician in Hull, I was forever catching my high-visibility vest and overalls on protruding scaffolding bolts when working at height. This became very annoying and potentially dangerous as the platforms we were working on were very narrow once the electrical containment was in place. This obviously meant that everybody had to walk side on for long periods of time which in turn, put us very close to the hand rails a lot of the time. The final straw for me was when a colleague snagged his safety harness upon a protruding bolt when leaning through the hand rails. For the safety conscious reader, he was clipped on to a higher tube via his harness. Unfortunately as he was now caught on a scaffold fitting bolt this meant he could not come back through until I came down from my platform and unhooked him. Thankfully he was not holding heavy materials at the time as he would have had to let it go since I could not get to him quickly. So, after returning from Hull I started to research the myriad of scaffold fittings on the market. This involved, as you can imagine hours and hours of internet searching. Boredom doesn’t come close.The Design Stage..
After said time I was happy that there were no other versions of what I had in mind on the market and hired a search company to verify this before applying for a patent. More hours tinkering in my garage with hand grinders, bits of tube and the odd M10 bolt, I finally came upon in my opinion the most effective way to remove the hazard of the protruding bolt in a traditional pressed steel scaffold fitting. Then I remembered a buddy from school who was in the designing world who had the software and know-how to bring my ideas to life and so I dropped him a Facebook message. He soon replied and our working relationship began. He drew up the first set of drawings so they were readable by engineers. We went through at least 7 major modifications before the final design was settled on and then contacted a metalworking specialist. Within a week, I had my first prototype to try (it did not fit) but I had a Datum to work from and soon ironed out the bumps. Of course during this time I was aware of plagiarism should the idea take off and so was given advice from a Design and patent company to ensure anyone I spoke to at least signed a NDA (Non-Disclosure Agreement). This of course gave me the peace of mind when discussing the product. [quote type=”center”] After four hours of selling myself, I came out with my only prototype professionally tested on a UKAS test rig and passing with flying colours. [/quote] My next step was to contact a Company that manufactured scaffold fittings in the UK so I could monitor the progress if they were interested. Turns out there is no such thing due to the price of British labour compared to other countries labour rates. This said, the company I’m currently working through, Presco Components Ltd are British based but manufacture in China. So a three hour drive to Birmingham from Plymouth to meet at 8am was under way. After four hours of selling myself, I came out with my only prototype professionally tested on a UKAS test rig and passing with flying colours. The next step was to have China make prototype that would fit in Presco’s current range of fittings. A lot of modifications had to be made but we are finally there.What the Safe Scaffold Bolt fits..
The basic version was designed for pressed steel fittings. This model will fit the following: 1. Standard Doubles 2. Swivels 3. Stair Tread Coupler 4. Girder Coupler 5. Access Gates Note: Only Pressed Steel couplers available at present. With slight adjustment to my bolt design it will fit the pressed steel Putlog coupler and the Board retainer. With cooperation from scaffold designers and manufactures I am able to tweak the design to fit Forged clamps. I have shown many scaffold workers, and have tried to listen to what they would like and try to please their wishes. For example, The first major hurdle was to prevent the bolt coming out the end of the collar nut whilst being transported and the bolt vibrating out the end. Not noticing a bolt is missing after climbing four lifts with heavy gear can get very tedious I imagine. The second problem in design was to make sure the strength was not compromised due to the shape and tolerances I had to work from. The bonus advantages from the nut being inside a long collar nut was the protection from the elements and protection from paints and other particulates that generally gather on the threaded bar. Of course the maintenance issues and the smooth operation of the bolts inside the collar nut are easily lubricated every time the bolt is wound back in and out. Prices are initially not as cost effective as I hoped due to the manufacturing processes required being new to the factories. All in all, I hope that this will become a familiar product on all sites around the world. (I can dream). For more information please visit: www.ssbproducts.co.uk Thanks Lee for taking time to tell us your story about The Safe Scaffold Bolt Fitting.We would like to read your comments on this, do you think this is a good product and idea ? let us know in the comments below.
![[Video] Ultimate ladder FAIL](https://scaffmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/ladderfail.png "[Video] Ultimate ladder FAIL")
buildings in vulnerable circumstances and significantly raise standards in this niche security sector.
The installation of scaffold alarms is a growing market, but to date has never been the subject of any form of self regulation or industry-specific standards. The NSI Code will provide a valuable aid for those with a vested interest in the security of buildings or the reduction of accidents, such as the Insurance and Health & Safety sectors respectively, to help mitigate risk during periods of vulnerability when repair or restoration work on a property is being carried out.
When widely adopted, the NSI Code will help tackle malpractice and raise standards within the scaffold security sector by becoming the industry benchmark. The NSI Code stipulates appropriate measures are put in place to ensure scaffold alarms are installed in a consistent manner which take into consideration the potential risks and areas of weakness. The benefits are likely to be far reaching; regardless of whether a building is domestic or commercial, vacant or occupied, contracting an installer who complies with the NSI Code will provide the consumer with the reassurance that the vulnerability of their property (and properties within close proximity) and the assets within, are appropriately protected during periods of building, renovation, maintenance or repair.
Commenting on this key industry development, Chris Pinder, NSI External Affairs Director stated “Certificating installers of scaffold alarm systems marks a new era for NSI. NSI has undertaken a pilot phase during which time we have been working with a prominent scaffold security provider who has been robustly tested against the Code’s requirements. Scaffolding Alarm Systems will be an additional scope of approval within our certification schemes for installers of electronic security systems and a public announcement regarding the first approved installing company will be issued in the very near future”.
For those wishing to receive more details on NSI Code of Practice NCP 115, please e-mail ![Can you help these lads out with a pay rise ? [PIC]](https://scaffmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/74609_10151425795185730_43143849_n.jpg "Can you help these lads out with a pay rise ? [PIC]")
Of particular concern to those in the scaffolding industry, the major battles between shippers and the shipping lines were mainly fought on the key Asia-Europe trade routes. This, in turn, meant that the cost of moving containers fluctuated widely over the course of the year making costing and budgeting in the scaffolding supply industry somewhat challenging.
The widely fluctuating state of the shipping industry is perfectly illustrated by glancing at the accounts of the world’s biggest carrier, Maersk, which turned a $600 million loss in Q1 2012 into a profit of half a billion dollars by Q3.
But it was soon all change again and, by the final quarter of the year, continuing austerity drives across Europe forced the shipping lines to once again fight for market share. Facing the prospect of mothballing monster container ships, the carriers opted instead to simply cut or cancel scheduled shipping voyages in an attempt to restore rates by reducing capacity. The initial signs suggest that the strategy has worked with Asia to North Europe rates climbing comfortably back again.
But are cheap rates all that the importers of scaffolding products and shippers are looking for? Although we all have an immediate need for cost savings and ‘value for money’, most importers would agree that one of the biggest issues in not just the cost but the rollercoaster nature of freight rates which make planning and managing your business so much more complex.
With overall global trade (not just scaffolding products) expected to expand by 4%-6% in 2013, and the shipping lines keeping capacity under control, experts are predicting a modest rises in freight rates during the year and, hopefully, not the variance we have seen in 2012.
But, without a doubt, the shipping lines’ operating costs are going to go up and, with little additional revenue coming in, they will have to absorb the costs of more expensive fuel, more costly labour and dearer raw materials on the back of stagnant or declining freight income.
One way that they are still looking at making cost savings is in the area of ‘slow steaming’ – although some now claim that this can benefit everyone in the supply chain.
Slower container ship speeds save shipping lines millions of dollars via hugely reduced fuel consumption although shippers are the potential supply chain losers. European importers of Asian goods, for example, face an additional week at sea for their stock with the subsequent added inventory costs, interest, insurance, depreciation and so on.
However, some major shippers in the FMCG and retail sectors are now saying that, with foresight and astute planning, they are beginning to benefit from slow steaming claiming that increased passage times have improved schedule reliability and, therefore, aided planning and costing.
Maersk has recently claimed that looking at the time cost element as a single measure does not take the full picture into account; their customers are not looking only at speed as a determining factor when designing their supply chains and that a stable and reliable service is equally important. It claims that its customers are realising monetary benefits in their supply chains due to the reliability and frequency of the service, even in a slow steaming scenario.
Nothing is certain but uncertainty and, with shipping costs equating to a growing percentage of the overall cost of scaffolding products and, therefore, services, one thing is for sure during 2013. Working with an experienced freight forwarding partner might not insulate you completely from the ‘slings and arrows’ of the international shipping industry but will certainly make the journey smoother.
