Builder fined £120,000 after fatal fall through unsafe floor

W G Carter was sentenced on 24 September after Richard “Felix” Roper fell while working on 30 August 2022. He died the following day.

The Health and Safety Executive said the incident happened after flooring and supporting timbers had been removed, leaving an area where workers were exposed to a fall from height.

W G Carter pleaded guilty to an offence under work-at-height legislation. The company was fined £120,000 and ordered to pay £5,247 in costs.

The case is relevant to the access sector because it centres on how work is sequenced once a previously safe working surface has been opened up.

HSE said a safer method was later adopted which used suitable access equipment so joists could be installed from below. That removed the need for workers to stand on or cross the exposed floor area while the structure was incomplete.

HSE guidance says construction work at height must be properly planned, supervised and carried out using suitable equipment. Where work at height cannot be avoided, the regulator says measures should first prevent falls, including collective protection such as scaffolds, tower scaffolds or mobile elevating work platforms.

The guidance also says safe access should be considered as part of the work method rather than after work has started. Equipment needed for the job should be identified and available before the task begins.

Falls from height remain one of the main causes of death and serious injury in construction. HSE says work sequencing, access arrangements and the condition of the working surface should all form part of the risk assessment before work begins.

For access contractors, the case is another reminder that temporary access requirements can change as a structure is stripped back, altered or rebuilt. A safe platform at one stage of a job can become an open fall risk once flooring, supports or edge protection are removed.

Read the HSE release.

Queensland coroner calls for mandatory tower scaffold controls after fatal collapse

A Queensland coroner has called for mandatory additional controls on freestanding tower scaffolds used in public places after finding that a widely used height-to-base “rule of thumb” was not enough to protect against strong winds.

Coroner Megan Fairweather made the recommendations following an inquest into the death of Andrew Stephen Jones, 37, who was struck by a tower scaffold while watching his son play football at Mitchelton Football Club in Brisbane on 25 July 2021.

The findings, delivered on 30 September, identify a broader industry issue around the way wind risk is assessed for low-level freestanding tower scaffolds and recommend changes to Queensland’s Scaffolding Code of Practice.

Scaffold was within accepted height-to-base guidance

The aluminium tower had been installed in April 2021 to provide a filming platform for Premier League matches. It stood in an open, publicly accessible area between two football pitches and was expected to remain in place for several months.

The structure measured about 3.1m overall, with the working platform just over 2.1m above ground. Its minimum base dimension was 1.28m and its height-to-base ratio was around 1.6:1.

The inquest heard that this was comfortably within the widely accepted industry guidance that a tower with a base greater than 1.2m could be considered stable where the working height did not exceed three times the minimum base dimension.

However, the coroner found that relying on that ratio alone did not provide an adequate assessment of wind risk.

Senior structural engineer Aaron Poole estimated that the tower’s critical wind range for toppling was between 47km/h and 54km/h. Evidence before the inquest placed likely gusts at the site on the day of the incident between 41km/h and 68km/h.

The current Australian guideline AS/NZS 4576:2020 advises that freestanding tower scaffolds should not be operated or left unattended where wind speeds may exceed 40km/h. Queensland’s Scaffolding Code, however, refers to “strong winds” without defining the term or giving installers a simple method for assessing when extra controls are required.

Simple controls could have prevented collapse

Mr Poole told the inquest that readily available measures including outriggers, tie-downs, tube-and-clip restraints and additional dead loads could substantially increase stability. His evidence was that appropriate controls could withstand wind loads above 70km/h and would very likely have prevented the incident.

The coroner said these measures were practical, accessible and affordable, and would remove the need for installers of lower tower scaffolds to carry out complex engineering calculations.

The findings also highlight a regulatory gap for lower towers. Because the scaffold’s working platform was below four metres, its erection did not require a High Risk Work Licence for scaffolding and routine inspections were not required under the relevant regulations. There was also no requirement for a formal handover certificate.

Fairweather found there had been no formal plan for ongoing monitoring or safety risk management after installation. She said the circumstances raised issues “much broader than the actions of any individual” and found that the accepted industry rule of thumb, when used in isolation, did not adequately assess strong-wind risk.

The coroner recommended that Queensland’s Office of Industrial Relations amend the Scaffolding Code of Practice to define “strong winds” and require freestanding tower scaffolds erected in public places to use additional controls appropriate to the circumstances.

She also recommended a comprehensive education campaign for manufacturers, suppliers, installers and hire companies, followed by a compliance campaign to ensure the changes are understood in practice.

A fourth recommendation calls for manufacturers and distributors to provide clearer instructions, guidance and warnings covering design choice, environmental conditions, location, public access, duration of use and suitable control measures.

The Coroners Court records the case as requiring a Queensland Government response. Under the state’s process for coronial recommendations, the government aims to publish its response within six months.

Previous prosecution

Mobile Scaffolds Queensland Pty Ltd, which supplied and installed the tower, was fined A$400,000 in August 2024 after being convicted of failing to comply with its health and safety duty. The company was in liquidation and the case was heard in its absence.

The coronial findings note that installer Christopher Sweedman was separately charged, but that charge was dismissed in November 2024 after the Work Health and Safety Prosecutor offered no evidence.

Fairweather found Mr Sweedman had acted in good faith within the limits of his training, experience and accepted industry practice. She also accepted expert evidence that he could not reasonably have been expected to understand and apply the engineering calculations contained in the relevant Australian standards.

Workplace Health and Safety Queensland issued a safety alert following the 2021 incident, warning that tower scaffolds must account for environmental loads, site location, prolonged installation and the safety of people nearby.

The Queensland Scaffolding Code of Practice 2021 currently requires environmental factors to be considered and calls for alternative height-to-base ratios or extra support where a tower is likely to be exposed to strong winds.

Adrian Chiles puts scaffolding skills shortage in national spotlight

A Guardian column has brought wider attention to recruitment pressures already affecting scaffolding contractors.

Broadcaster Adrian Chiles has put scaffolding recruitment in the national spotlight with a Guardian column published on 1 October.

His comments follow NASC’s warning earlier this year that the scaffolding and access sector could have around 40,000 roles to fill when recruitment demand, retirements and staff turnover are taken into account.

The figure is an estimate extrapolated across the wider industry. The trade body’s survey put existing vacancies among its full member companies at around 1,760 when the findings were published in March.

Contractors feel the pressure

NASC’s Skills Gap Report 2026 found that 56% of responding firms had at least one vacancy. Some 83% expected to recruit during the year, with scaffolders accounting for the largest share of anticipated demand.

Unfilled jobs were already affecting business. Almost half of respondents, 47%, reported a reduced ability to take on new contracts, while 46% said existing staff faced increased workloads.

Retirement adds further pressure. The report estimated that around 1,459 directly employed workers across full NASC members could leave through retirement by 2029.

Writing in the report, NASC group chief executive Clive Dickin said: “Our report finds structural challenges, including recruitment difficulties, uneven regional pressures”.

Training takes time

NASC has called for continued investment in apprenticeships and CISRS training. It has also argued for short-term migration policy support to help experienced overseas scaffolders meet demand while new entrants complete their training.

The research was based on 151 responses collected from full NASC member organisations in December 2025. Its membership-wide totals are estimates, and the survey did not directly cover non-member businesses.

For contractors, the immediate issue is capacity. The report connects recruitment difficulties with fewer opportunities to accept work and greater pressure on the people already on site.

PERI UK appoints Craig McDonnell as engineering director

PERI UK has appointed Craig McDonnell as engineering director, with responsibility for its nationwide engineering teams and the design of scaffolding, formwork and temporary works solutions.

McDonnell brings more than 25 years’ engineering experience to the role. Based at the company’s Rugby headquarters, he will provide technical leadership for teams supporting construction and infrastructure projects across the UK.

He previously progressed to senior engineering manager at J. Murphy & Sons, where he led the contractor’s temporary works design team. His work included early utility diversions for HS2’s Curzon Street station in Birmingham and the Transpennine Route Upgrade between York and Leeds.

McDonnell said his experience on the contractor side had shaped his approach to working with temporary works suppliers, particularly the need to involve engineering teams before work reaches site.

“The earlier we get involved in the design process, the greater the opportunity to add value,” he said.

“If a client comes to us twelve weeks before they get to site, my team can help them understand what equipment is needed, where and how it will be used and how it can be installed safely and efficiently.”

He said earlier involvement gives engineers more scope to assess installation methods and consider alternative designs while contractors still have flexibility in their plans. He also acknowledged that contractors often face urgent requirements and short lead times.

“Having worked as a client of temporary works suppliers, I’ve seen first-hand what contractors need from engineering partners,” he said. “Ultimately, it’s about providing practical solutions that help clients deliver projects safely, efficiently and on programme.”

McDonnell studied mechanical engineering at Liverpool John Moores University before working in the design and manufacture of rail braking systems.

He later moved into civil and structural engineering at Mabey Support Systems, working on propping, support and bridging. His subsequent experience included movable passenger access structures for cruise ships and ferries, followed by underground supports and foundation work at Morgan Sindall.

At PERI UK, his priorities include improving the efficiency of engineering operations and strengthening customer relationships.

“What attracted me to PERI is that engineering is front and centre of everything they do,” he said.

How do you get off the tools? Two men who did it properly

THE DEBRIEF – THE EDITOR’S TAKE ON THE BRACE YOURSELF PODCAST

Every scaffolder has asked the question at some point: how do you get off the tools?

I got off them by accident, into trade news and publishing, which I don’t recommend as a repeatable route. The latest episode of The Brace Yourself Podcast is about doing it properly. Simon Boyes and Ben Beaumont are joined by Lee Buckley, who runs scaffold design firm Buckley Design Solutions in Manchester, and Tony Nicolaisen, Technical Authority at Altrad in Denmark. Both started on the tools. Both now work in design. And they got there by very different routes.

Lee’s route: college by day, spanners the rest of the week

Lee started as a yard operative in 1996, worked on the tools and ran sites. He enjoyed it and earned good money. He only realised design was possible when an old boss made the move first.

Getting there was hard graft. For the first year he trained one day a week, unpaid, with a designer. He paid his own way through college one day a week. The other three days he was on the tools, picking up all the weekend overtime he could to cover the money he was losing.

In year two he went into design full time. Once he knew it was for him, there was no half measure. The spanners went in the wheelie bin.

Tony’s route: teach yourself, then prove it

Tony came through the Danish apprenticeship and worked onshore and offshore. He loved the tools. What bothered him were the drawings coming from engineers who had clearly never built a scaffold. He looked at them and thought: I can do better than that.

So he taught himself. He read the scaffold standards for pleasure, the way his wife reads novels. He watched engineering channels on YouTube until the formulas made sense.

Then came the day a job offshore was stopped because someone said the scaffold couldn’t take a four-tonne load. Tony said it could, and did the calculations to prove it. They told him he wasn’t an engineer. So the calculations went to an engineer to check. The answer came back: your numbers are fine.

Because he holds no engineering licence, his designs are still checked and stamped by a qualified engineer. But the knowledge is his own.

The money question, answered honestly

Most people assume getting off the tools means a pay cut, and for most people it does. Lee covered his with overtime.

Tony never took one. Denmark had no scaffold designers who actually knew scaffolding, so when Altrad needed one, he could name his price. “I want to earn more money,” he told them. “But if you can find somebody else, do it. I will be your guest.” They paid.

For me, that’s the most useful lesson in the episode. Whether you take a pay cut depends on whether you are asking for a chance or filling a gap nobody else can fill. Tony filled a gap. But he spent years teaching himself before that conversation ever happened.

The fear is the real barrier

Both men are honest about being scared, and neither was scared of the scaffolding.

Lee was expelled from school in his final year and left with no qualifications. “Going back to the textbooks was terrifying for me,” he says. “The thought of going back to school just made me nervous every day.”

He had also never used a computer. When college assignments had to be handed in on a disk, he didn’t know how to put his work on one. So he handed in a blank disk. Every assignment. For two years. Nobody at the college ever checked.

Tony wasn’t afraid of the studying. He was afraid of the computer. “Getting AutoCAD handed over, it almost took me a month before I could draw a single line.”

Plenty gets said about the barriers to getting off the tools, and most of it is about qualifications and money. Listen to these two and the real barrier is simpler: the fear of looking daft. Both of them felt it. Both did it anyway.

Why time on the tools makes a better designer

Lee’s advice for designers who have never scaffolded is the best line of the episode: “Ask how the scaffolders want to do the job, and then shut up and listen.”

Everyone he trained spent time on the tools. Not to become scaffolders, but to understand the job. “If you don’t know how hard it is to try and top out a twenty-one foot tube next to your shoulder, then only then will you stop putting joints in standards just in the top of the lift.”

Tony describes what happens when someone in nice shoes turns up on site: the scaffolders see another office worker coming to tell them how to do a job they’ve done for twenty years. Arrive knowing the trade and speaking the language, and the respect comes on its own.

His own role shows where that can lead. A Technical Authority is an independent quality check on a project, with the power to stop a job if the standards aren’t right. In Tony’s words, even if it is the project manager or the CEO.

Mentors, and leaving the right way

Lee’s route into running his own business wasn’t gentle. Working under an established designer, he was never paid a salary. The deal was thirty per cent of what they made. “If we make nothing, you’ll get thirty percent of nothing.” The weeks ran to sixty and seventy hours.

Then he was told it wasn’t working out and he needed to set up on his own. Kicked out of the nest, as he puts it. Sink or swim.

Here’s the part worth copying: his mentor kept mentoring him. For years afterwards, the two checked each other’s designs. The man who pushed him out stayed in his corner.

The lesson is plain. This industry is small. The person you leave may end up checking your work, sending you work, or buying from you. Leave properly.

The safety net is the tools

Both men give the same answer to anyone who’s scared to try: the worst that can happen is you go back to something you’re already good at.

“You put your belt back on, you go back out,” Lee says.

His test for anyone who’s undecided: will you be sat on a beam in the middle of Manchester, soaking wet, wondering why you didn’t take the chance?

Tony answers with a sentence his late father used to repeat to him, and it’s the line of the episode: “You never, ever should sit in a chair and be seventy years old and tell yourself, why didn’t I do that?”

The episode also includes Tony’s preview of next summer’s Scaff Fest, the three-day festival he is helping to organise: system and tube-and-fitting competitions side by side, design-and-build challenges, live demos, exhibitions, camping and a family-friendly setup. Built by scaffolders, for scaffolders. Details at scafffest.com.

The latest episode of The Brace Yourself Podcast is available through the Brace Yourself channels on YouTube, Spotify and Apple Podcasts. ScaffMag is the show’s Official Media Partner.

Saudi firm plans SR1.2bn scaffolding manufacturing complex

Manar Al Omran plans a million-square-metre industrial complex in Saudi Arabia to manufacture scaffolding and formwork for domestic projects and export markets.

Saudi scaffolding and formwork company Manar Al Omran has announced plans for a SR1.2 billion (approximately £242 million) industrial complex to expand its manufacturing operations and supply overseas markets.

The MAO Industrial Complex will cover approximately one million square metres in Saudi Arabia’s Eastern Province, according to the company’s announcement dated 2 September. Plans include five factories, a corporate headquarters and accommodation for 7,000 employees.

MAO says the development will bring the manufacture of scaffold systems and their components onto one site, including steel processing, casting and protective finishes. Production is intended to serve Saudi construction and energy projects, as well as export customers.

Scaffold systems and components

The largest part of the development is a 750,000-square-metre scaffolding and steel complex. MAO says it will include production facilities for Ringlock, Cuplock and scaffold tubes, alongside engineered formwork and structural steel fabrication.

Shot blasting, powder coating and hot-dip galvanising are also included in the plans. A separate foundry will manufacture grey and ductile iron castings for scaffold fittings and components.

The company puts daily output for the scaffolding and steel complex at 1,200 tonnes. Its announcement does not give a breakdown between scaffold products and other steel work.

Chairman Maher Al Harbi said: “When this complex is complete, every tube, every rosette, every cup, every casting and every formwork panel a project needs will come from one fence in the Eastern Province, made in Saudi Arabia, by MAO, with nothing outsourced.”

Export ambitions

An aluminium extrusion plant with eight presses is planned to produce sections for scaffolding and other industrial uses. MAO gives its annual capacity as approximately 200,000 tonnes.

The wider development will also include plastic profile and sheet production, together with an engineering research and development office.

The investment sets out MAO’s ambition to manufacture more of the equipment it supplies through its scaffolding rental and services business. The company says it is targeting customers across the Gulf and export markets worldwide, although the announcement does not identify UK or European supply plans.

Scaffmag recently reported on MAO’s 67.40m free-standing scaffold in Dammam, which the company built using its own Ringlock system.

A completion date or timetable for bringing the complex into production has not been given in the announcement.

More than 2,100 buildings still await cladding remediation start

Government figures show 46% of monitored buildings in England are recorded as awaiting work on unsafe cladding.

Cladding remediation has yet to start on 2,153 residential buildings in England, according to government data published on 30 September.

The Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government’s August update covers 4,724 monitored buildings at least 11 metres tall. Of these, 1,849 have completed remediation, including those awaiting building control sign-off, and 722 have work underway.

The awaiting-start total includes 86 social housing buildings whose remediation status is unknown because providers have yet to supply dates. An estimated 103,000 homes are in monitored buildings recorded as awaiting work.

Remediation deadlines

The government’s July 2025 plan set a target to complete remediation on all residential buildings at least 18 metres tall in government-funded schemes by the end of 2029.

It also announced plans for legislation requiring landlords to finish work on buildings between 11 and 18 metres by the end of 2031. These were proposed legal deadlines, rather than requirements already in force under that announcement.

For scaffolding and access contractors, the backlog points to substantial potential work as projects reach site. The figures provide no measure of scaffolding orders or access requirements, however, so they cannot establish how much work will reach the sector or when.

Scaffold collapses at Sydney site weeks after two workers seriously injured

The scaffold came down at a development on Wattle Street in Ultimo, inner Sydney, shortly before 6:45pm on Saturday, damaging parked vehicles and narrowly missing people travelling along the road.

No injuries were reported.

CCTV footage published by 7NEWS shows the multi-storey scaffold falling across the carriageway during strong winds, with vehicles and a cyclist passing close to the structure moments before it came down.

Fire and Rescue NSW crews attended the scene. A large section of scaffold, estimated by firefighters at around 20 metres long and 10 metres high, was left lying across several traffic lanes.

SafeWork NSW inspectors attended the site and opened an investigation. Regulatory notices were issued to the site’s managers, including a prohibition notice.

The precise cause of the collapse has yet to be established. Strong winds were reported at the time, but no official finding has linked the weather to the failure.

Second serious incident at same site

The latest incident comes less than 2 months after a wall and part of the roof collapsed at the same development on 3 August.

Debris fell onto vehicles at the neighbouring service station, trapping and seriously injuring 2 men, one in his 60s and another in his 30s.

Both were taken to hospital in a serious condition. Five other people were assessed by paramedics but did not require hospital treatment.

SafeWork NSW began investigating that incident and work at the development was halted. Australian media reported that work had only recently resumed before Saturday’s scaffold collapse.

The building, formerly used as a rehearsal studio, has approval for demolition as part of plans for a multi-storey mixed-use development.

SafeWork NSW’s investigation into the latest collapse is continuing.

£4.22m Falkirk scaffolding framework opens for bids

The procurement covers scaffolding services across council housing properties and is split into two lots.

Lot 1, valued at an estimated £4.04m, covers scaffold drawings, delivery, erection and handover, maintenance, dismantling and removal. Lot 2, valued at £180,000, covers scaffold inspections, tie and anchor testing, reports and test certificates.

The council intends to appoint up to five contractors to each lot, with bidders able to submit tenders for both. The framework is scheduled to run from 1 February 2027 to 31 January 2031.

UK-based bidders must meet the council’s registration requirements, while participants and proposed subcontractors are required to hold full National Access & Scaffolding Confederation membership, or an equivalent level of membership with another national access and scaffolding trade body.

The tender is being run through Public Contracts Scotland. Bids must be submitted by 11am on 30 October 2026.

The £4.22m figure is the council’s estimated value for the full framework term rather than a confirmed contract award.

View the official procurement notice on Public Contracts Scotland.

PERI scaffolding supports major HS2 Birmingham dive-under works

0

The structure forms part of Delta Junction, north-east of Birmingham, where several sections of the high-speed railway converge. Its main reinforced concrete walls rise to 11m.

PERI UK has supplied PERI UP Flex modular scaffolding to provide access and support around the high wall sections, alongside a package of formwork and temporary works equipment.

Access platforms built from PERI UP Flex have been used by teams installing reinforcement to the 11m walls. PERI says its scaffold and formwork designs were coordinated by its engineering teams before arriving on site to reduce potential clashes between the temporary works systems.

Access around 11m concrete walls

The height of the walls also created significant pressures during the concrete pours.

BBV used PERI’s VARIO girder wall formwork, which can be configured with closer spacing between its girders, walers and ties to cope with the loads generated by the taller pours.

Dan Biggs, senior sales engineer at PERI UK, said: “One of the benefits for the customer is that they’re not having to go to three different suppliers for accessories, scaffolding, and formwork.”

Concrete pressure sensors were also installed on selected wall pours, allowing the project team to monitor loads on the formwork in real time and compare the results with the pressures calculated during the design stage.

The wider PERI package includes MAXIMO panel formwork for foundation works and BECOSTOP permanent stop ends for sections of the base slab where reinforcement congestion made conventional timber stop ends difficult to install.

High-level working platforms

The access arrangement changes as construction moves towards the roof slab.

PERI’s SCS brackets can be anchored directly to the completed 11m walls to create high-level working platforms. These provide access for reinforcement installation and support the formwork used around the roof slab edge.

The system removes the need for the working platform to be supported from ground level and avoids ties passing through the finished concrete structure.

The Birmingham Spur forms part of HS2’s wider Delta Junction works in the West Midlands, which are being delivered by Balfour Beatty VINCI. The junction carries the main HS2 route and the spur serving Birmingham.